Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Csaba Nagy wrote:
>
>>> We have _ample_ evidence that the problem is lack of people able to
>>> review patches, and yet there is this discussion to track patches
>>> better. It reminds me of someone who has lost their keys in an alley,
>>> but is looking for them in the street because the light is better there.
>>>
>> Bruce, I guess the analogy fails on the fact that you're not looking for
>> a key, but for people, and I thought "better light" will attract people
>> to find you instead of you to need to search...
>>
>
> I believe the problem is not that there isn't enough information, but
> not enough people able to do the work. Seeking solutions in areas that
> aren't helping was the illustration.
>
>
There are multiple problems.
Of course no amount of technology will provide us with a bigger pool of
qualified reviewers. That doesn't mean our present management methods
are good - you seem to be just about the only person left who thinks
they are. Moving from using a quill to using a fountain pen or even a
ballpoint doesn't mean we have more writers or better writers. But it
does make writing easier and is therefore a good thing to do.
cheers
andrew