Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:14:24PM +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> cache instead. In the index scan phase, it's randomly accessed, but if
>> the table is clustered, it's in fact not completely random access. In
>> the 2nd vacuum pass, the array is scanned sequentially again. I'm not
>
> Only if there's only one index on the table... otherwise I'd argue that
> you're much less likely to be searching the TID list incrementally.
Yeah, sure.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com