Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:14:24PM +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> cache instead. In the index scan phase, it's randomly accessed, but if 
> the table is clustered, it's in fact not completely random access. In 
> the 2nd vacuum pass, the array is scanned sequentially again. I'm not 

Only if there's only one index on the table... otherwise I'd argue that
you're much less likely to be searching the TID list incrementally.
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)