-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/07 14:41, Tony Caduto wrote:
> Mark Walker wrote:
>> It's sort of a matter of taste, but there are lots of people who like
>> to keep there logic on the server or at least within sql statements,
>> so there's probably a good sized market that your not reaching if you
>> ignore it.
>>
> That is a good point, I and many developers I know like to keep all the
> business logic on the server in stored procedure and functions and
> having this ability as a native part of Postgresql would be a huge
> advantage.
> DBlink is a decent workaround,but it becomes a pain having to wrap
> everything with the dblink syntax, plus there is a little bit of
> overhead involved creating a connection over TCP/IP to run a query on
> the same server. DBlink is great when you need to connect to a
> different server though.
True distributed transactions would be handy, though.
Many of our design decisions might have been different had they been
available.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFv7FZS9HxQb37XmcRAjtPAJ9/eXPPp7xcOWYPhfkNVYudAeXB+wCfU96x
9ENICnZnVmYj59GB7niatyY=
=aQsm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----