Jan van der Weijde wrote:
> Thank you.
> It is true he want to have the first few record quickly and then
> continue with the next records. However without LIMIT it already takes a
> very long time before the first record is returned.
> I reproduced this with a table with 1.1 million records on an XP machine
> and in my case it took about 25 seconds before the select returned the
> first record. I tried it both interactively with pgAdmin and with a
> C-application using a cursor (with hold). Both took about the same time.
That doesn't sound right to me, not for a straigforward SELECT * FROM
where there's no sorting etc.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd