Re: Preserving Cluster-Wise Data
| От | Andrew Dunstan | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Preserving Cluster-Wise Data | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4575B51A.9070709@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Preserving Cluster-Wise Data (Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Preserving Cluster-Wise Data | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Volkan YAZICI wrote: > Hi, > > I was taking a look at _SHARED variable implementation of different > PLs and it looks like every PL implements its own ad-hoc method to > preserve cluster-wise data. Wouldn't it be beneficial to have a > cluster-wise table (sytem catalog?) which is accessible by any > procedure with required (superuser?) privileges? With such a table, > procedures (and PLs) will be able to preserve their state data > natively without need of any ad-hoc method and because of we're using > a just yet another plain table, all of the MVCC related stuff will be > handled by PostgreSQL easily. > > The data might well be PL and session specific, though. e.g. a perl function ref would be both. I don't know what state we would want to preserve across sessions anyway. Let's see a use case that a plain user level table wouldn't serve. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: