Re: Memory usage per postmaster process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
Дата
Msg-id 4559.1383489471@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Memory usage per postmaster process  (Grzegorz Tańczyk <goliatus@polzone.pl>)
Список pgsql-general
=?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogVGHFhGN6eWs=?= <goliatus@polzone.pl> writes:
> On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Author: Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
>>
>> Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
> I checked this patch:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com

> I can't find it here:
> http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

> I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest
> list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

If you read the rest of the discussion of the patch, you'd find out that
what got committed was not all that much like Pavel's original.  But
it has the same effect.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Grzegorz Tańczyk
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GSSAPI server side on Linux, SSPI client side on Windows