Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Memory usage per postmaster process |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4559.1383489471@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Memory usage per postmaster process (Grzegorz Tańczyk <goliatus@polzone.pl>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
=?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogVGHFhGN6eWs=?= <goliatus@polzone.pl> writes: > On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Author: Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400 >> >> Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries. > I checked this patch: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com > I can't find it here: > http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html > I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest > list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere. If you read the rest of the discussion of the patch, you'd find out that what got committed was not all that much like Pavel's original. But it has the same effect. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: