Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
От | Grzegorz Tańczyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory usage per postmaster process |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16269363.1371383472862009.JavaMail.root@Polzone обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [100% SPAM] Re: Memory usage per postmaster process (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I checked this patch:Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400 Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com
I can't find it here:
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html
I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.
I am using ispell.If you're not using ispell, it's not relevant, and I'm not sure whether the savings were significant for anything but Czech.
Thanks
--
Regards,
Grzegorz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: