Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
| От | Mark Dilger |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4553AE9F.9090501@markdilger.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module >> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised >> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and >> plperl subtleties. > > I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of > pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly > this reason. If this is fixed, what becomes the mechanism for an administrator to make a perl module available to plperl functions? I didn't see any other way to do this documented. Thanks, mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: