Re:

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Jones
Тема Re:
Дата
Msg-id 453FAEE2-5DD1-41F9-8485-2C8BCEFA12D0@engineyard.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re:  (Waldemar Bergstreiser <littlesuspense@web.de>)
Ответы Re:  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re:  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Jun 30, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Waldemar Bergstreiser wrote:

>> I don't get it either.  by *= do you mean the Oracle-style outer
>> join?
>> in which case why is this not just
>>
>> select * from a,
>> left outer join b on (a.b_id = b.id)
>> left outer join c on (b.c_id = c.id)
>> left outer join d on (a.d_id = d.id)
>> left outer join f  on (d.f_id = f.id)
>>

<snip>

>
>>> select * from a left outer join b on (a.b_id=b.id) ....
>>>
>>> But I don't see any clear way to specify that table C should be
>>> outer joined only if we got a row from table B.
>>
>> Well that would be the default since if you get no row from b b.c_id
>> will be null.
>>
>
> and if I have a row in table C where c.id is null? A don't know.

No, it's perfectly clear as 'NULL = NULL' evaluates to false:

postgres=# select null = null;
  ?column?
----------

(1 row)

Erik Jones, Database Administrator
Engine Yard
Support, Scalability, Reliability
866.518.9273 x 260
Location: US/Pacific
IRC: mage2k






В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "James B. Byrne"
Дата:
Сообщение: BETWEEN not matching on timestamp value
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BETWEEN not matching on timestamp value