Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Дата
Msg-id 45365.68.143.134.146.1135791213.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane said:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
>> seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function
>> you'll be back in the same boat regardless.
>
> Right, I was not suggesting that fixing the validator would avoid the
> bug.  It just surprised me that libperl was getting called in the
> restore-a-dump scenario.
>
> BTW, I was just about to go change the validator, but if you want to do
> it go ahead...
>


no, please do.

cheers

andrew





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixing row comparison semantics