Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Дата
Msg-id 17999.1135789988@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
> seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function you'll
> be back in the same boat regardless.

Right, I was not suggesting that fixing the validator would avoid the
bug.  It just surprised me that libperl was getting called in the
restore-a-dump scenario.

BTW, I was just about to go change the validator, but if you want to
do it go ahead...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrew Dunstan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Следующее
От: "Andrew Dunstan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)