-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/06 09:47, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 10/18/06, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
>> > I tested binary quite a bit and only found it to be a win if moving
>> > blobs in and out of the database. On 'normal' tables of mixed fields
>> > types of small size, it can actually be slower. Binary is a bit
>> > faster for native types and bytea, and slower for character types.
>>
>> "native types"?
>
> types operated on directly by the processor. int2, int4, int8, float4,
> and float8, and their various aliases :).
>
> in short, i think using binary for anything other than bytea is a
> waste of effort/time, except for bytea.
That's counter-intuitive, since you'd (well, I'd) think that doing a
binary copy would be faster since the code would bypass the int-to-
ascii conversion.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFNkRyS9HxQb37XmcRAn4tAJ4xRFmA/T82/iFi4O+sfvBGk4Y+EgCfVjn0
CFs2nT9w6RxTj8dV5C4kBUk=
=2RRX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----