korryd@enterprisedb.com wrote:
>> heh. I was just doing it the way Tom suggested - see attached. With a
>> little more trouble we could also keep track if the listened for events
>> and sometimes save ourselves a second call to WSAEventSelect, but I'm
>> not sure it's worth it.
>>
>
> It all depends on the overhead of WSAEventSelect(). I'm sure your version would run faster, but I just don't know if
"slower"would be measurable.
>
>
> BTW: I would suggest changing your comment to:
>
> /*
> * make sure we don't multiplex this kernel event object with a
> different socket
> * from a previous call
> */
>
> Thanks for tackling this problem too.
>
Ok. Applied to HEAD and 8.1 and 8.0 branches.
cheers
andrew