Re: [HACKERS] Possible explanation for Win32 stats
От | korryd@enterprisedb.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Possible explanation for Win32 stats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1154201708.27274.17.camel@sakai.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
heh. I was just doing it the way Tom suggested - see attached. With a little more trouble we could also keep track if the listened for events and sometimes save ourselves a second call to WSAEventSelect, but I'm not sure it's worth it.
It all depends on the overhead of WSAEventSelect(). I'm sure your version would run faster, but I just don't know if "slower" would be measurable.
BTW: I would suggest changing your comment to:
/*
* make sure we don't multiplex this kernel event object with a different socket
* from a previous call
*/
Thanks for tackling this problem too.
-- Korry
---- Korry Douglas korryd@enterprisedb.com EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com |
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: