Sorry, should have been more specific.<br /> Version 8.1.0<br /><br /> update statement called from a bash script
where$tbl is table name and $sch is schema name<br /><br /> update pg_class set reltriggers = <br /> (select count(*)
frompg_trigger where tgrelid = <br /> (select oid from pg_class where relname = '$tbl' and relnamespace = <br />
(selectoid from pg_namespace where nspname = '$sch')))--should have been a limiting where clause here<br /><br /><br />
Thanks,<br/><br /> Roger<br /><br /> Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid27390.1153026781@sss.pgh.pa.us"
type="cite"><prewrap="">Roger Ging <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:roger@musicreports.com"><roger@musicreports.com></a>writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre
wrap="">Iaccidentally wrecked the pg_class table in a database by leaving off
the where clause of an update statement when setting the reltriggers
back to the count from pg_trigger after a bulk data load. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
What was the *exact* update statement, and which PG version is this?
regards, tom lane </pre></blockquote>