Tom Lane wrote:
> ... equal claim to inclusion
> in core. Perhaps more, because it gives us an extra layer of insulation
> from JVM licensing questions.
>
Tom,
Why to you persist talking about licensing issues with PL/Java? There are none. PL/Java
builds and runs just fine with gcj and the above statement is completely false.
Dave,
What JVM requirements does PL/J currently have? What license implications are imposed by the
components that it depends upon?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren