Re: Automatically setting work_mem

Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
> 
>> Tom,
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/06 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>>> This would buy what exactly?
>>
>>
>> I guess you didn't read the other 80% of the post.
>>
>> In short, faster performance through more aggressive runtime 
>> compilation.  A
>> JIT for the database kernel.  It's not like I'm on shaky ground here - 
>> other
>> commercial DBMS have done it for over a decade.
>>
> In exactly a fortnight from today, I'll repost my suggestion to rewrite 
> the backend in Java ;-)

Please do! we haven't seen this suggestion for quite a while, I'm 
starting to miss it...

Regards,
Andreas