Re: Automatically setting work_mem

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> 
> On 3/17/06 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
>> This would buy what exactly?
> 
> I guess you didn't read the other 80% of the post.
> 
> In short, faster performance through more aggressive runtime compilation.  A
> JIT for the database kernel.  It's not like I'm on shaky ground here - other
> commercial DBMS have done it for over a decade.
> 
In exactly a fortnight from today, I'll repost my suggestion to rewrite the backend in Java ;-)

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren