Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig A. James
Тема Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Дата
Msg-id 440775E9.50009@modgraph-usa.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>>I'm creating user-defined server extensions, written in C per the
>>manual "31.9. C-Language Functions".  Everything works well, but only
>>if I fully link the .so such that there are *no* unresolved external
>>references at all.  Not even the stuff in libstdc++.a can be left out.
> 
> If you're using libstdc++.a, you are not writing C.  There is no support
> for C++ in the backend, and I would strongly advise not trying to use
> it, as any of C++'s moderately interesting features like exceptions will
> not play nicely with the backend environment.

Unfortunately, we're also using a second library (OpenBabel) that is written in C++.  A good portion of the code I've
writtenis a wrapper layer that hides the C++ objects and presents a simple C wrapper that works for Postgres.
 

Craig


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch
Следующее
От: "John"
Дата:
Сообщение: Installation problem