Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Дата
Msg-id 12593.1141337490@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
Ответы Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com> writes:
> I'm creating user-defined server extensions, written in C per the
> manual "31.9. C-Language Functions".  Everything works well, but only
> if I fully link the .so such that there are *no* unresolved external
> references at all.  Not even the stuff in libstdc++.a can be left out.

If you're using libstdc++.a, you are not writing C.  There is no support
for C++ in the backend, and I would strongly advise not trying to use
it, as any of C++'s moderately interesting features like exceptions will
not play nicely with the backend environment.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Следующее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning Patch