Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com> writes:
>
>>This overall design seems more flexible than Tom's recent post in which he
>>stated that justify_days should call justify_hours internally.
>
>
> AFAIR I said the exact opposite.
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom Lane also wrote:
> assumption), but justify_days should be changed to be effectively a
> combination of both functions --- that is, it should fix all three
> fields using both the 30days and the 24hours assumptions. Then it could
> guarantee that all come out with the same sign.
How is changing justify days so that it touches the hours field different from
having justify_days call justify_hours?
mark