Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Дата
Msg-id 43C2F652.3030901@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It has probably been sufficiently mitigated on *nix. On Windows, the 
choice seems to be between living with the risk and trying my "put the 
locales back where they were" patch, which as Tom and Greg point out 
might have other consequences. Take your pick.

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Is there a TODO here, even if the Perl folks are supposed to fix it?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>I'm just about out of ideas and right out of time to spend on this.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>We could just file a Perl bug report and wait for them to fix it.
>>>
>>>    
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>done
>>
>>    
>>
>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)