Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
Дата
Msg-id 4383E3BB.3060705@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to  ("Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt@greenplum.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Chuck McDevitt wrote:

>Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to
>use it.
>  
>
If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included 
in core. Otherwise
you are creating a dependency on the largest postgresql used OS (linux). 
The advantage
here of course is that we would be able to eliminate readline support 
and focus only on
libedit.

The downside is yet another software in core.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>  
>


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: server closed connection on a select query
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: syntax extension for unsupported JOINs coming from a binary only (unmodifyable) program