Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
Дата
Msg-id 10099.1132718656@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included 
> in core.

We already do support libedit; support does not mean "include", for
either readline or libedit.

I think it'd be reasonable to provide a configure option to control
selection of libedit or readline on platforms where both are (or
appear to be) available.  I'm not excited about changing the default
behavior, though, especially not on the grounds that "IBM just broke
readline on AIX and therefore we should deprecate readline everywhere",
which appears to be the reasoning offered so far.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: syntax extension for unsupported JOINs coming from a binary only (unmodifyable) program
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tablespaces and non-empty directories