Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax

Tom Lane wrote:

>
>I feel the best idea for a non-initdb-forcing solution is to hardwire
>the template knowledge into CREATE LANGUAGE for 8.1 (with of course the
>intention of doing my full original proposal for 8.2).  With that in
>place, the only messiness from loading old dumps is that you would have
>handler function definitions in public --- but they wouldn't be used
>(the actual languages would rely on handlers in pg_catalog) and could be
>dropped easily.
>
>
>  
>

Ok, that sounds good. Maybe have pg_dump issue a warning about the 
useless handler funcs left lying around?

cheers

andrew