Re: Nested transaction workaround?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Sidney-Woollett
Тема Re: Nested transaction workaround?
Дата
Msg-id 4305.192.168.0.64.1074009352.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Nested transaction workaround?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Tom Lane said:
> I wouldn't call it "nested" transactions: the remote transactions would
be committed, and would stay committed even if you roll back the caller.

Ah, that's true. This means the dblink could be used to provide
functionality equivalent to Oracle's #PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS directive.

Thanks for clearing that up.

John




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?
Следующее
От: "Keith C. Perry"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cryptography, was Drawbacks of using BYTEA for PK?