Re: Postgres XA support

Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Allman <msa@allman.ms> writes:
>
>>I think JDBC XA is going to require a lot more work.  The server-side 2PC
>>support coming in postgres 8.1 is a good thing, but it's not XA.
>
>
> Oh, I just *love* someone unilaterally relocating the goal posts
> months after the design and implementation are frozen.  Especially
> when the new location isn't even inside the same stadium.

As far as I can see, all of JTA/XA is implementable with the 8.1 stuff
-- it just needs extra work on the JDBC side to get all the behaviour there.

-O