Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl (Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
|
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
>> >>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go? > > > DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons. DBI is very well supported. > More importantly, almost all database-related work is done by building on > DBI. Interfacing your own code with those of others is then relatively > straightforward. See, for some examples, DBIx::RecordSet or Class::DBI. > Finally, if you every need to port to another database product (GASP!), DBI > is fairly easy to adapt (depending on DB-specific SQL). DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Sean > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: