Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
| От | David |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050810202214.GA1935@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:28:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go? > >DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons. DBI is very well > >supported. > DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake Well, it's still unanimous, and coming from people who have my respect. Spent yesterday reading the DBD::Pg mailing list. Now plan on studying the manpages for DBD and for DBI. It shouldn't be much of a chore rewriting what little I've done so far into DBI code. Thanks again to everyone who replied. Maybe I've already said it, but I thought I was seeing just what all of you have said, but just wasn't sure.
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: