Tom Lane wrote:
>Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>
>
>>On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If it's a matter of whether VACUUM removes rows or not, that's expected:
>>>open-transaction bookkeeping is done across the whole cluster. (This is
>>>not something simple to change, since we may have to consider
>>>transaction IDs in shared catalogs.)
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>I wonder if this restriction could be lifted if we tracked last-vacuum-
>>Xid per relation?
>>
>>
>
>No, that's unrelated. What is of concern is the open-transaction
>horizon.
>
From a Slony-I users standpoint - the idle transactions cause
pg_listener bloat, which can impact replication performance on busy sites.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.