Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux

Dave Cramer wrote:
> Yes, it does, my mistake ( It was early here )
>
> However reading the notes about setTimestamp:
>
> When the DBMS does not store timezone information the driver will use
> cal to construct a JDBC Timestamp value.
> If no Calendar object is specified the driver uses the timezone of  the
> JVM.

Where's this from exactly? It doesn't seem to make sense if it's talking
about setTimestamp -- the driver does not construct a JDBC timestamp in
setTimestamp at all, it's given one by the application.

-O