Re: language handlers in public schema?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: language handlers in public schema?
Дата
Msg-id 42BF076A.7030708@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: language handlers in public schema?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: language handlers in public schema?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>regression=# explain analyze select * from pg_proc WHERE NOT proisagg AND (pronamespace != (select oid from
pg_namespacewhere nspname = 'pg_catalog') 
 
>regression(# OR oid in (select lanplcallfoid from pg_language) OR oid in (select lanvalidator from pg_language));
>
>  
>

Yeah. I think we'd need to add "where langlcallfoid != 0" so we don't 
pick up the internal/C/sql handlers. However, on closer inspection it 
appears that doind all this in pg_dump would be lots more invasive than 
I first thought. An alternative would be to adopt AndrewSN's suggestion 
of an extra schema (or possibly two) created by initdb where we put 
extra stuff. That would mean a very simple addition to initdb.c and no 
changes to pg_dump, except ...


>Next question is whether there are any other places that would be
>affected besides createlang/droplang.  I can't think of any offhand,
>but ...
>
>
>  
>

me either, but I wonder if we should provide an option on pg_dump to 
restore function handlers found in public to whatever we decide about 
the above.

thoughts?

cheers

andrew





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity