Re: language handlers in public schema?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: language handlers in public schema? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2619.1119815718@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: language handlers in public schema? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: language handlers in public schema?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Yeah. I think we'd need to add "where langlcallfoid != 0" so we don't
> pick up the internal/C/sql handlers. However, on closer inspection it
> appears that doind all this in pg_dump would be lots more invasive than
> I first thought.
Why --- what else is needed beyond the addition of those clauses to the
one query?
> me either, but I wonder if we should provide an option on pg_dump to
> restore function handlers found in public to whatever we decide about
> the above.
I don't see the need. If they were in public before, they can stay
there --- or the DBA can run createlang before running pg_restore to
put them where he wants.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: