Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>
> It strikes me that these names just might have some significance to
> developers but will have none at all for users. I don't heve a better
> alternative ... maybe because the purpose has been expressed somewhat
> fuzzily.
I'd define the purpose like this:
- being a db that's existing reliably right after initdb, unless deleted
by an ( evil-minded :-) admin.
- contain data for cluster wide system services, e.g. pgAgent schedules,
configuration for autovacuumV2, profiling data
regards,
Andreas