Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Inline PL/pgSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 427FA4C3.4080107@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Inline PL/pgSQL ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > As for implementation, I think it would obviously be best to leave > plpgsql on its own as a PL but maybe change BEGIN and DECLARE in the > normal parser and have the system generate/execute a function on the > fly. Or, maybe it would be better to integrate plpgsql. Or, I may just > be crazy. > > Would anyone else ever benefit from inline functions? Well I could see inline functions being useful for debugging a function during development but I don't think I would want a bunch of plPGSQL mucking up my pretty SQL :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: