Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
>>time to replace it.
>>    
>>
>
>CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
>matter in hand.  What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
>sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.
>
>  
>
I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were 
driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-)

cheers

andrew