Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marc G. Fournier
Тема Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Дата
Msg-id 20050504114704.Y53065@ganymede.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement  (Shridhar Daithankar <ghodechhap@ghodechhap.net>)
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement  (Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> 
>>> As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
>>> time to replace it.
>>> 
>> 
>> CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
>> matter in hand.  What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
>> sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.
>> 
>> 
> I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were 
> driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-)

Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide 
"per directory user restrictions"?  Where I could give CVS access to 
Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory?

Serious question here, since I don't know, I only know CVS can't (or, 
rather, not that I've ever been able to find in the docs) ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement