Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)
Дата
Msg-id 4256.1019626801@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Ответы Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> ...Based on that data, I'd vote against making any changes to NAMEDATALEN.

It looked to me like the cost for going to NAMEDATALEN = 64 would be
reasonable.  Based on these numbers I'd have a problem with 128 or more.

But as you observe, pgbench numbers are not very repeatable.  It'd be
nice to have some similar experiments with another benchmark before
making a decision.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Следующее
От: Hiroshi Inoue
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction