Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> > ...Based on that data, I'd vote against making any changes to NAMEDATALEN.
>
> It looked to me like the cost for going to NAMEDATALEN = 64 would be
> reasonable. Based on these numbers I'd have a problem with 128 or more.
>
> But as you observe, pgbench numbers are not very repeatable. It'd be
> nice to have some similar experiments with another benchmark before
> making a decision.
Yes, 64 looked like the appropriate value too. Actually, I was
surprised to see as much of a slowdown as we did.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026