Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around
Дата
Msg-id 421631A7.9010706@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes:
>
>>In fact, I think it is so bad, that I think we need to back-port a fix to
>>previous versions and issue a notice of some kind.
>
>
> They already do issue notices --- see VACUUM.
>
> A real fix (eg the forcible stop we were talking about earlier) will not
> be reasonable to back-port.

Would at least a automated warning mechanism be a reasonable backport?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


--
Command Prompt, Inc., your source for PostgreSQL replication,
professional support, programming, managed services, shared
and dedicated hosting. Home of the Open Source Projects plPHP,
plPerlNG, pgManage,  and pgPHPtoolkit.
Contact us now at: +1-503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around