Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Gary Doades |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41E38231.5090301@gpdnet.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Dave Cramer wrote: > Ok, so one use case is to select a large number of rows and do some > non-trivial operation on them. > I can see where getting the rows inside the server process ( ie some > procedural language ) thereby reducing the round trip overhead would be > beneficial. However how do you deal with the lack of control ? For > instance what happens if you run out of memory while doing this ? I'm > not sure about other DB'S but if you crash the procedural language > inside postgres you will bring the server down. > > It would seem to me that any non-trivial operation would be better > handled outside the server process, even if it costs you the round trip. Since a .NET language is operating effectively inside a VM it is pretty much impossible to bring down the server that way. Only a bug in the .NET runtime itself will do that. The C# try/catch/finally with .NET global execption last chance handlers will ensure the server and your code is well protected. Cheers, Gary.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: