>>
>>Also, let me be specific here. My complaint is with paid
>>banners mostly. They seem completely unneeded. If we want
>>to leave banners to those who contribute then I would not
>>raise a fuss.
>>
>>
>
>I believe most of them are the freebies. I'm not adverse to losing the
>ads altogether, but I do think we should credit the mirrors in a visible
>way (ie. Not one specific page). On the mirror selection page, or a
>per-mirror footnote seem the best options.
>
>
I think either of those are good options.
>
>
>>Hey -- what if I can convince them to donate one of their
>>appliances? We would get the google engine and we could make
>>it look any way we want and index as much as we want?
>>
>>
>
>If you can persuade them to do that then I would be most impressed :-)
>
>However, what problems do you have with the current search?
>
>
Nothing that I would swing a sledgehammer at. It works.
However compared to Google it just seems slow which
in reality it should be consider Google's resources.
As I said in a previous email (just before this one) this
is the absolute least of my complaints ... the advertising
is my big gripe.
If I were to point a single stick it would just be that
Google is:
1. A brand the OSS community trusts
2. Provides an incredible search engine
3. Allows us to be site specific
4. Performs faster
5. Its Google
I know it is silly but #5 is a big thing right now. Google is
the name, and having our search linked via it lends credibility
to the results.
Just my .02.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Regards, Dave.
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL