Re: Large transaction problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul B. Anderson
Тема Re: Large transaction problem
Дата
Msg-id 4193E45A.7050000@pnlassociates.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large transaction problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Large transaction problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Large transaction problem  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Список pgsql-admin
After I restart postgresql, I execute vacuum several times in sql until it succeeds.  Then, everything else works OK again.

After I clear the problem,

  select count(*) from archive

takes a second but, before the problem is cleared, it takes about 30 seconds and then gives the canceled by user response.

The vacuum was run using the vacuumdb command rather than from psql.  It was in a cron script running under user postgres.  There was a .pgpass file.  The command was  

  /usr/bin/vacuumdb --all --full --analyze

This is postgresql on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (ES) from RPMs postgresql-7.4.3-2PGDG, etc.

Thanks.

Paul



Tom Lane wrote:
"Paul B. Anderson" <paul@pnlassociates.com> writes: 
My postgresql.conf file had a 10 second timeout and the large database 
required more than 10 seconds for the vacuum.  It seems that this left 
postmaster and/or the particular database in a state where any SQL 
against that database gave the same error response about being canceled 
by the user.   
Hmm, I couldn't duplicate this.  I thought maybe the vacuum wasn't
releasing some lock after it failed, but there's no sign of such a
problem.

Are you sure it isn't just that all your queries were running into the
timeout?
		regards, tom lane

.
 

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large transaction problem
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large transaction problem