Re: Query Tuning
| От | Pallav Kalva | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Query Tuning | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4166CE72.2050900@deg.cc обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Query Tuning (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
Tom Lane wrote: >Pallav Kalva <pkalva@deg.cc> writes: > > >> I have a problem with the below query, when i do explain on the >>below query on my live database it doesnt use any index specified on the >>tables and does seq scan on the table which is 400k records. But if i >>copy the same table onto a different database on a different machine it >>uses all the indexes specified and query runs much quicker. >> >> > >It looks to me like you've never vacuumed/analyzed the copy, and so you >get a different plan there. The fact that that plan is better than the >one made with statistics is unhappy making :-( ... but when you only >show us EXPLAIN output rather than EXPLAIN ANALYZE, it's impossible to >speculate about why. Also, what PG version is this? > > regards, tom lane > > > Thanks! for the quick reply. I cant run the EXPLAIN ANALYZE on the live database because, it takes lot of time and hols up lot of other queries on the table. The postgres version I am using is 7.4 . when you say " i never vacuum/analyxed the copy" you mean the Live database ? or the copy of the live database ? . I run vacuum database daily on my live database as a part of daily maintanence.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: