Re: Query Tuning
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Query Tuning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13657.1097253776@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Query Tuning (Pallav Kalva <pkalva@deg.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Query Tuning
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Pallav Kalva <pkalva@deg.cc> writes:
> I have a problem with the below query, when i do explain on the
> below query on my live database it doesnt use any index specified on the
> tables and does seq scan on the table which is 400k records. But if i
> copy the same table onto a different database on a different machine it
> uses all the indexes specified and query runs much quicker.
It looks to me like you've never vacuumed/analyzed the copy, and so you
get a different plan there. The fact that that plan is better than the
one made with statistics is unhappy making :-( ... but when you only
show us EXPLAIN output rather than EXPLAIN ANALYZE, it's impossible to
speculate about why. Also, what PG version is this?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: