Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Byrne
Тема Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Дата
Msg-id 41643DEB39E4DA4EB6A7AF4A8C9F88BB7E71B887@mdb-mail2kX.MDBCapital.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they are lingering around. It works for
9.0-> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in
versionsprior to 9.0 an additional check will have to be added. 

Thanks
Dave Byrne

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM
To: Dave Byrne
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade

Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com> writes:
> Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
> pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
> database with the message 'old and new databases "postgres" have a
> different number of relations'

> On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade checks that the number of
> relations are the same but includes orphaned temp tables in the comparison.

> Is this expected behavior?

Seems like an oversight.

            regards, tom lane

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: mosbench revisited
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade