Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>I haven't seen any particular reason why we should adopt another SCM.
>>Perhaps BitKeeper or SubVersion would be better for our purposes than
>>CVS, but are they enough better to justify the switchover costs?
>
>
> BitKeeper ist not open source, so it's out of the question for most
> people.
Not for Linus Torvalds apparently.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola