Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment)

Tom Lane wrote:
> I haven't seen any particular reason why we should adopt another SCM.
> Perhaps BitKeeper or SubVersion would be better for our purposes than
> CVS, but are they enough better to justify the switchover costs?

BitKeeper ist not open source, so it's out of the question for most 
people.  Subversion is shockingly unstable.  I'm very open for 
something that replaces CVS, but I'd rather not use any than one of 
these two.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/