Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4113.1555520660@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:49 PM Ajay Pratap <ajaypratap@drishti-soft.com> wrote:
>> Correction: I meant when my java application dies postgres should break all the connections that were associated
withthat peer.
> And how is the server supposed to detect that without keepalives? TCP
> is dessigned to survice for extended period of times without traffic,
> I used that a lot in the dial up times.
> And what makes you think keepalives are impactful and unrealistic? I
> use them a lot, they do not impact my workloads measurably.
If we tried to do something about that in the server code proper,
we'd basically be reinventing TCP keepalives --- probably badly.
And we couldn't do it at all without a protocol version break,
because the client-side code would also need to know about it.
Just use the keepalive facility.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: